MY MISSION is to alter the very framework of the nation's political dialogue. Read more

Things that make you go hmmmm

Santorum rewrites Declaration of Independence:  Equality comes from Judeo-Christian God and is a right reserved for those who conform to (his) God’s laws:

Rick Santorum: Equality Comes From ‘God Of Abraham, Isaac And Jacob,’ Not Islam ”Rick Santorum said during a campaign stop on Friday that the concept of equality comes from the “God of Abraham,” not from other religions…Santorum went on to suggest that people who don’t live according to what he termed “God’s law” can’t claim “equality.” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/21/rick-santorum-equality-islam-religion-south-carolina_n_1220767.html

 

Where’s Teddy Roosevelt when we need him?

TechCrunch | Damning Evidence Emerges In Google-Apple “No Poach” Antitrust Lawsuit  Next week a class-action civil lawsuit will be heard in San Jose to determine if Google, Apple, Pixar, Lucasfilm, Adobe, Intel, and Intuit conspired to eliminate competition for skilled labor.  http://techcrunch.com/2012/01/19/damning-evidence-emerges-in-google-apple-no-poach-antitrust-lawsuit/

The Government Can’t Create Jobs? Yeah, Right…

Yesterday morning, I listened as Romney surrogate Chris Chocola, Club for Growth, repeated the Republican mantra that government doesn’t create a single job. Try shutting down our national security apparatus–defense, homeland security, intelligence, all the support contractors right down to farmers, uniform suppliers, companies making those million dollar toilet seats…and you’ll see just how many jobs the government creates.  In fact, if this occurred, there would be a global depression.  (I’ll save the Adam Smith debate about warfare as the biggest misuse of national resources for another day.)

Given the enormity of this one area of government job creation, we don’t have to argue about all those public employees outside the military-industrial complex that seem to be dispensible these days–the cops, teachers and firefighters, or the scientists and engineers that, thanks to taxpayer R&D, gave us the Internet, GPS and countless life-saving drugs or, gasp, clean air and water.  We won’t even debate the valuable government subsidies for critical technology, like the microchip that spawned a global economic revolution and produced, literally, millions of jobs.  (“After the microchip was invented in 1958 by an engineer at Texas Instruments, ‘the federal government bought virtually every microchip firms could produce.’ NASA bought so many [microchips] that manufacturers were able to achieve huge improvements in the production process—so much so, in fact, that the price of the Apollo microchip fell from $1,000 per unit to between $20 and $30 per unit in the span of a couple years.” Is America Losing Its Mojo?  Fareed Zakaria, Newsweek, 1/14/09.)

Every single GOP candidate regurgitates this anti-government talking point while, in the very next breath, asserting that as government officials they’ve created more jobs than anyone else in the race: Newt claims about 11 million jobs while Speaker of the House in the Clinton years; Perry touts his “one million jobs” Texas record while ignoring both the quality of those private sector jobs (most are minimum wage) and the very large number of public sector (government) jobs included in his figures; and Romney wants credit for his time as Governor (although Mass. was 4th lowest in new jobs in those years).  As for his 15 years at Bain Capital, Mitt argues that 100,000 jobs were created through his company’s investments and expertise, while ignoring analysis from the WSJ that it was a wash, at best, when Bain-related layoffs, bankruptcies and outsourcing are included.  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204331304577140850713493694.html

Each Republican candidate says they will push through lower taxes and cut regulations–a sure way to unleash the currently oppressed private economy. If this oft-repeated theory of domestic growth is correct, then why were the Bush years, with a Republican Congress cutting taxes and regulations in six of the eight years, such an abysmal time for job creation? According to the leftist rag, the WSJ, ”The Bush administration created about three million jobs (net) over its eight years, a fraction of the 23 million jobs created under President Bill Clinton‘s administration and only slightly better than President George H.W. Bush did in his four years in office.” http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2009/01/09/bush-on-jobs-the-worst-track-record-on-record/  And remember, GWB had two wars going and created the mammoth Dept. of Homeland Security to help with those job numbers.

In my new book, Patriot Acts, I look at the facts about tax cuts and job growth over the last century.  As I ask in the book, please ignore current rhetoric and put your thinking cap on for a moment. The GOP argument is that we need tax cuts for ‘job creators’ to grow the economy.  If the wealthy ‘investor class’ was impoverished, if they didn’t have private capital to invest, this position might hold water, but those at the top (individuals and corporations) are sitting on a record pile of cash–cash that has grown throughout the largest economic downturn since the Great depression; cash that is not being invested here at home.

Since the early 80′s, as their rates have gone down, wealthy individuals have not reinvested much of their tax savings in domestic job growth. Instead, they’ve saved most of that money, spent it on luxury goods or invested it abroad. Even Reagan realized his ‘trickle down theory’ wasn’t working.  In 1986, he raised corporate tax rates and eliminated the special break for capital gains, demanding equal taxes on income from wealth and income from work.  Today, Republicans bow to their hero but ignore his own realizations about the failings of supply side economics.

This week, the WSJ reported that, contrary to the insane propoganda we’re hearing on the campaign trail, about 69% of US corporations pass through their earnings and pay NO federal corporate income taxes.  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203733504577026361246836488.html  When companies do pay taxes, the average rate is 18.3%–and this at a time when the federal debt is exploding and state budget shortfalls are rampant.

As for ‘deregulation’ creating significant job growth, former Reagan economic advisor Bruce Bartlett put it bluntly. “It’s just nonsense. It’s just made up.” The Bureau of
Labor Statistics tracks companies’ reasons for large layoffs.  It reported that corporations
attributed 1,119 layoffs to government regulations in the first half of 2010, while 144,746 were attributed to poor “business demand.”  Simply put, American consumers didn’t have money to buy goods.

I don’t care about labels; I care about facts.  Whether you’re a liberal or conservative, you should demand honest information before making decisions.  Supporting policies based on utter nonsense is insane, period.  As you listen to the arguments and assertions from our various candidates, as you watch their incendiary attack ads, think about this statement (warning?) from a top Romney campaign advisor made to NYT’s Tom Edsall:  “We are in the persuasion business, the propaganda business … Ads are agitprop … Ads are about hyperbole, they are about editing…They are manipulative pieces of persuasive art.”

 

 

Check it out

http://www.dylanratigan.com/2011/11/02/net-worth-of-congress-rises-by-25-since-financial-crisis/

Had a great conversation with Dylan Ratigan 11/1; he’s right on the money.

 

Capitalists of America, Unite! (Why Adam Smith would be marching today)

That’s my rallying cry for the protestors on Wall Street, for the millions of citizens  who are unemployed, for the anti-government Tea Partiers and for the nation’s small business owners and entrepreneurs.  It is time to expose the imposters and reclaim capitalism for the American people.

Today, Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations is considered a Bible for capitalism, but when published in 1776, it was a blasphemous challenge to the big business, big government mercantilism in Europe.  Smith’s free market theories expanded economic opportunity, promoted competition and encouraged innovation, in large part, by attacking the “concentrated wealth and power” of Britain’s commercial elite.

More than taxation without representation, it was the corrupt British economic system that ignited the American Revolution–just read the entire Declaration of Independence.  This
insidious corruption was a major focus of Smith’s economic treatise.  Smith’s theories dovetailed beautifully with Thomas Jefferson’s political manifesto, and his writings became the framework for our capitalist philosophy.  But as both men learned in their lifetime, theory and practice are rarely in sync.

In a Faustian bargain, our leaders pay homage to Smith’s ideals, but from the outset, they have ignored his model in favor of rapid national expansion and global economic power.   What we call capitalism is, in fact, the American version of mercantilism.  Ludwig von Mises, a libertarian economist, summed up its benefits rather nicely: “Capitalism gave the world what it needed, a higher standard of living for a growing population.”  Measured thusly, the results have been successful for quite some time, but if the goal is the long-term viability of our economic and political democracy, we are in serious trouble.

Just as Jeffersonian democracy operates best on a small scale, Adam Smith believed his self-correcting free markets were ideal for small businesses in a domestic economy.  Integrated in their communities, these businesses would be influenced directly by the needs and demands of consumers, and any dangerous or abusive conduct would rarely affect the broader economy.  But Smith treated large, powerful companies very differently.  He said big business was led by “an order of men…that generally have an interest to deceive and even to oppress the public”, and he referred to powerful corporations (then known as joint stock companies) as “unaccountable sovereigns” that were as dangerous to free markets as tyrannical governments. Unrestrained, they had the power to shape society and governments for their own purposes, and consumers would pay for “all the extraordinary profits” while suffering from “all the extraordinary waste”, the inherent fraud and abuse, that accompanies such immense economic power.

Smith stated emphatically that a strong government, acting through democratic and legal institutions, was the only entity capable of challenging such corporate power.  Smith supported necessary government regulations, labor and human rights, public education, and progressive taxation to ease the economic and social inequities he knew would occur in a capitalist system.  Without these “liberal” measures, social and political unrest would threaten a nation’s stability and his free market economy could not survive.

While Thomas Jefferson applauded Smith’s theories, the ‘father of American conservatism’, Alexander Hamilton, denounced this philosophy as nonsense.  Hamilton intended to establish America as a global powerhouse in short order.  He was thinking big and didn’t have time for Smith’s small-scale, go-slow approach.  Britain’s mercantile system was elitist and abusive, but Hamilton knew it was the engine that drove England’s powerful economy.  As secretary of the treasury, he used that very system to propel America onto the world stage.

Both his plan and its execution were brilliant.  Hamilton set out to consolidate power in the new federal government by controlling the money supply, tariffs and trade and by managing the nation’s industrial development.  Farmers and shopkeepers couldn’t provide the revenue he needed, nor could they finance the commercial development and infrastructure necessary for America to play in the big leagues.  Hamilton needed big money and powerful partners in the private sector.

To accomplish this, he used the courts and Federalist Congress to institutionalize a powerful  federal government and corporatist economy, a practice continued by his successors.  The myth that corporations are somehow “persons” and equivalent to the human beings Adam Smith was liberating in his free market utopia is possibly the most successful coup in the history of the world, achieved with the stroke of a judicial pen in 1886.

Despite warnings by prescient Republican presidents like Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt and Dwight Eisenhower, the American system has morphed quite predictably into a dog-eat-dog economic Darwinism, and the big canines have rigged the game in their favor.

Flying the capitalist flag, the really big guys have completely corrupted Smith’s free market philosophy. They use their concentrated wealth and power to buy off politicians, skate around regulations, abuse their privileges and sometimes, break the laws to win.  When their politicians and corporate-sponsored “citizen” groups insist that small government and the market itself are sufficient checks, that further controls are a socialist plot to destroy capitalism, they are counting on our collective naiveté to win the game.  They are destroying free enterprise by abusing the very freedoms intrinsic to a market economy.

That so many conservatives, adamant that they are defending true capitalism, would fail to make this distinction, gives credence to the power of the “big lie.”  They have so internalized this nonsense, that again and again, they are willing to defend transnational behemoths over the well-being of the American economy.

As one (somewhat mysterious) financial trader said in a BBC TV interview last week, a crashing economy is a brilliant opportunity for savvy insiders to make a killing.  The economic well-being of a nation or its citizens is not a major factor in the world of transnational commerce.  Predicting that the economic crisis will deepen, he summed up his message with a smile–governments don’t rule the world, Goldman Sachs rules the world.

For true American patriots who believe in a vibrant free market economy, it is time to recognize we’ve been sold a bill of goods.  The real enemy in the battle for American capitalism is not socialism; it is global corporatism.  For true patriots, conservatives and liberals alike, the stakes could not be higher.

My new book, Patriot Acts—What Americans Must Do to Save the Republic, examines the true nature of our constitutional system, how it has been interpreted and manipulated by conservatives and liberals since 1789, the effect of partisan ideology on this democratic system, including the economy, national security, health care, education and immigration, and how modern politicians  betray the founding principles, constitutional system and economic capitalism that all Americans, left and right, profess to defend. Patriot Acts can be preordered on-line and will be released on November 1, 2011.

Switch to our mobile site